SILEX Revision Notes
Strong's Concordance was first published in 1890. While it remains an invaluable reference, advances in linguistics, archaeology, and textual studies over the past 130 years have revealed areas where its glosses can be improved. These revision notes document where the Scattered Israelites Lexicon (SILEX) corrects or clarifies Strong's entries based on modern Biblical scholarship.
καίω G2545 (kaíō)
The revised gloss corrects the etymology, stating that the verb is of uncertain origin and not clearly derived from an identifiable root, in contrast to the original's assumption of a primary verb.
κακοπάθεια G2552 (kakopátheia)
The SIBI gloss corrects the original Strong's etymology, noting that the original's derivation from ἡμιώριον is incorrect. The correct etymology is from κακός and πάθος.
κακός G2556 (kakós)
The original gloss suggests κακός is 'apparently a primary word,' while the revised gloss asserts the etymology is uncertain and not derived from a known root, correcting the implication of etymological clarity in the original.
Ἀλφαῖος G256 (Alphaîos)
The original Strong's gloss asserts a Hebrew origin (specifically connecting to חֶלֶף), whereas the revised gloss states the origin is uncertain, only possibly relating to Hebrew or Aramaic forms. The revised gloss corrects the certainty expressed in the original regarding derivation.
καλέω G2564 (kaléō)
The revised gloss corrects the original's derivation from the base of κελεύω, stating that the etymological connection is not linguistically secure.
ἅλων G257 (hálōn)
The Strong's gloss asserts a probable derivation from the base of εἱλίσσω ('to roll'), whereas the revised gloss explicitly states the etymology is uncertain and the connection to 'roll' or 'tread' is speculative. This corrects the original gloss's unwarranted etymological confidence.
καλύπτω G2572 (kalýptō)
The original gloss claims καλύπτω is akin to κλέπτω ('to steal') and κρύπτω ('to conceal'), while the revised gloss corrects this by stating there is no etymological relationship to κλέπτω, only a possible relation to κρύπτω, and the root is ultimately uncertain.
κάμινος G2575 (káminos)
The SIBI gloss corrects the original's confident derivation of 'κάμινος' from 'καίω' by stating that this etymology is uncertain and possibly incorrect, suggesting instead a non-Greek or Pre-Greek origin.
καμμύω G2576 (kammýō)
The SIBI gloss corrects Strong's etymological claim. Strong's asserts the word derives from a compound of κατά and the base of μυστήριον, but the revised gloss states the etymology is uncertain and not clearly from that compound.
κάμνω G2577 (kámnō)
The original gloss asserts κάμνω is 'apparently a primary verb,' implying a known, independent Greek root, while the revised gloss states the root is uncertain and possibly non-Attested in Indo-European, correcting the claim of clear etymological origin.
Κανᾶ G2580 (Kanâ)
The revised gloss corrects the original's etymology by stating that the derivation from Hebrew קָנָה (qanah) is uncertain and only a possible origin, whereas the original asserts it as the etymology.
Καπερναούμ G2584 (Kapernaoúm)
The revised gloss clarifies and narrows the etymology, noting that the identification of 'Nahum' is uncertain and that the link to the prophet Nahum is traditional and not definitively established, whereas the original gloss presents the derivation as more certain.
καρδία G2588 (kardía)
The revised gloss corrects the original's implication that 'καρδία' derives from a primary root or from Latin; it clarifies that the Greek term is not derived from Latin 'cor' and its Greek origin is uncertain. The revised gloss also more accurately reflects modern lexical understanding by addressing the broader semantic range, but the primary material correction is etymological.
καρπός G2590 (karpós)
The SIBI gloss corrects the original Strong's etymological claim that καρπός is probably from the base of ἁρπάζω ('to seize'). The modern gloss states the etymology is uncertain and that there is no direct connection to ἁρπάζω, challenging the original's speculation.
Κάρπος G2591 (Kárpos)
The original gloss says 'perhaps for καρπός', suggesting uncertainty about the derivation, while the revised gloss affirms the name is derived from καρπός ('fruit') and clarifies the typical naming practice, removing the doubt present in the original. This makes the disagreement one of etymology.
ἅμα G260 (háma)
The revised gloss corrects Strong's assertion that ἅμα is a 'primary particle' by stating its origin is uncertain. This is an etymological correction.
καταδικάζω G2613 (katadikázō)
The original gloss incorrectly states that the verb καταδικάζω is derived from 'κατά' and a derivative of δίκη, whereas the revised gloss accurately derives it from 'κατά' and the verb δικάζω. The revised gloss corrects the etymological root provided in the Strong's gloss.
καταδυναστεύω G2616 (katadynasteúō)
The revised gloss corrects the original by giving the correct verbal source (δυναστεύω) for the derivation instead of 'a derivative of δυναστής', and by clarifying the role of the prefix. The revised also broadens the definition and context, but the main material correction is in the etymology.
κατακληροδοτέω G2624 (kataklērodotéō)
The revised gloss corrects the original's etymology by clarifying that the term is derived from κληροδοτέω ('to bestow as an inheritance'), not directly from a compound of κλῆρος and δίδωμι, as Strong's states. The original presents a less precise root derivation.
ἀμάραντος G263 (amárantos)
The original Strong's gloss claims that the second element is 'a presumed derivative of μαραίνω', while the revised gloss clarifies that the term is formed from ἀ- and μαραίνω and notes that μαραίνω itself is of uncertain further derivation, correcting the presumption of etymological certainty in the original.
ἁμαρτάνω G264 (hamartánō)
The SIBI gloss corrects the original Strong's etymological note, stating that the proposed derivation from 'A' (negative particle) and 'meros' (part/share) is now widely considered incorrect, and that the precise etymology is uncertain.
καταμόνας G2651 (katamónas)
The revised gloss corrects Strong's etymological explanation. Strong's offers a speculative derivation involving an accusative plural and implied 'places,' which the revised gloss notes is interpretive rather than linguistically certain. The revised gloss states the term is simply built from κατα and μόνος and functions adverbially, without necessity of a plural or spatial nuance.
καταναρκάω G2655 (katanarkáō)
The revised gloss points out that the verbal root connection for ναρκάω is debated, indicating that the etymological certainty claimed in the original (that the word comes directly from 'to be numb') is overstated. The revised gloss also clarifies that the sense is likely related to causing numbness or insensitivity, not strictly 'to be numb,' correcting the original's straightforward etymology assertion.
καταντάω G2658 (katantáō)
The revised gloss corrects the original by noting that the etymology is debated and that the sense of 'opposition' from ἀντί is not inherent in the verb's meaning, while the original gloss implies opposition ('meet against').
κατάνυξις G2659 (katányxis)
The revised gloss explicitly corrects the original's speculation about derivation from νεύω ('to nod') or νύξ ('night'), stating these are speculative and considered unlikely. It also clarifies the meaning as 'numbness' or 'spiritual insensibility' rather than just 'slumber,' thus correcting both the etymology and partly the definition.
κατάρα G2671 (katára)
The revised gloss corrects Strong's gloss by stating that the preposition κατα does not necessarily convey 'intensification' but rather direction ('against' or 'down'), challenging Strong's claim of 'intensive.'
κατασκιάζω G2683 (kataskiázō)
The REVISED gloss corrects the etymology, noting the word is derived from κατά and σκιά ('shadow'), not a derivative of σκιά as the original suggests. The original gloss's etymology is imprecise. The REVISED gloss also offers a broader sense of meaning, but the core correction is etymological.
κατατομή G2699 (katatomḗ)
The revised gloss corrects the original Strong's etymology, specifying that the root is κατα- and τέμνω, while the original generically says 'a compound of κατά and (to cut)' without identifying the precise verb root. The revised gloss clarifies the linguistic derivation.
ἀμάω G270 (amáō)
The revised gloss corrects the original's claim that ἀμάω is derived from ἅμα. The updated gloss states that the etymology is unclear and disputes the direct link to ἅμα.
κατήφεια G2726 (katḗpheia)
The revised gloss corrects the original Strong's etymological suggestion by noting that the exact derivation is uncertain, whereas Strong's speculates a compound with the base of φαίνω. The revised gloss presents this as more tentative and notes the uncertainty, correcting Strong's potentially misleading etymological claim.
καυχάομαι G2744 (kaucháomai)
The revised gloss corrects the original's claim of a specific (albeit 'obsolete') base related to εὔχομαι or a particular verb base, stating that the origin is actually uncertain and not definitively linked to a specific base. The definition is effectively the same, but the etymology in Strong's is overconfident compared to current lexical consensus.
Κεγχρεαί G2747 (Kenchreaí)
The revised gloss corrects the original's assertion that the name Cenchreae derives from 'millet' (kegchros), noting that this connection is speculative and not definitive according to modern scholarship.
κεῖμαι G2749 (keîmai)
The original gloss incorrectly identifies the verb as 'middle voice of a primary verb,' whereas the revised gloss clarifies it is a primary verb of uncertain origin, not the middle of another verb. This corrects the etymology presented in the original.
κείρω G2751 (keírō)
The revised gloss corrects the original by stating the etymology of κείρω is uncertain, whereas the original simply labels it as a 'primary verb' without acknowledgment of etymological uncertainty, which more recent scholarship highlights.
κελεύω G2753 (keleúō)
The original gloss asserts a specific primary root "to urge on" and connects κελεύω to the meaning 'hail', and defines it partly as 'to incite by word.' The revised gloss corrects this by stating that the derivation is uncertain and notes that the word does not inherently carry the sense of incitement or urging, but rather authoritative command. Therefore, the disagreement is both about the asserted etymology and the nuance of 'incitement' versus authoritative command.
κεραία G2762 (keraía)
The revised gloss clarifies that the precise etymology is uncertain beyond the connection to 'horn,' whereas the original assumes a derivation from the base of κέρας. The revised gloss also avoids an overconfident etymological assertion.
κεράμιον G2765 (kerámion)
The original Strong's gloss claims 'neuter of a presumed derivative of κέραμος,' implying some uncertainty or indirect derivation, while the revised gloss clarifies that the term derives directly from 'κέραμος' with a transparent morphological formation in Greek. This corrects the original's implication of uncertainty.
κέραμος G2766 (kéramos)
The revised gloss corrects the original's confident etymological link to κεράννυμι, indicating instead that the origin is uncertain and that the connection cannot be confirmed in modern scholarship.
κέρας G2768 (kéras)
The revised gloss corrects Strong's etymology; Strong's incorrectly derives κερας from a word meaning 'hair of the head', but modern scholarship finds no such derivation and notes that the origin is uncertain.
κεφαλή G2776 (kephalḗ)
The original gloss claims a primary root meaning ("from the primary in the sense of seizing") and links the meaning to 'seizing,' while the revised gloss states the etymology is uncertain. This corrects speculative and now outdated etymological information in the original.
κηπουρός G2780 (kēpourós)
The revised gloss corrects the original's implication that the second element of the word means 'warden'—the modern analysis clarifies that the suffix simply indicates a person associated with or responsible for something, not an official 'warden.'
Κηφᾶς G2786 (Kēphâs)
The original gloss incorrectly states 'of Chaldee origin,' implying Chaldean (Babylonian) roots, and uses 'Chaldee' to refer to Aramaic, which is outdated and potentially misleading. The revised gloss corrects this, specifying the origin as the Aramaic word כֵּיפָא (kepha), not Chaldean, and clarifies its linguistic history.
ἀμετανόητος G279 (ametanóētos)
The original claims the second element comes from a 'presumed derivative' of μετανοέω, while the revised properly recognizes μετανοέω as the direct root. The revised corrects the hesitation in the etymology.
Κιλικία G2791 (Kilikía)
The revised gloss corrects the original's implication that the foreign origin of the name is probable but unspecified, by noting more specifically that the name is non-Greek (likely Anatolian) and that its precise linguistic derivation is uncertain. This expresses greater scholarly caution regarding the etymology than the original.
κινάμωμον G2792 (kinámōmon)
The original gloss asserts a direct connection to the Hebrew קִנָּמוֹן, whereas the revised gloss clarifies the borrowing is from a Semitic source and that its ultimate origin is likely South or Southeast Asian, correcting an overly simplistic etymological claim in the original.
κινέω G2795 (kinéō)
The revised gloss corrects the Strong's etymology, stating the root is uncertain and supplying updated linguistic evidence, rather than Strong's specific derivation as a poetic form of βαίνω (to go).
Κλαυδία G2803 (Klaudía)
The revised gloss corrects the origin, stating that 'Claudia' is from Latin, not simply a Greek feminine form, and supplies the possible root meaning 'lame' or 'limping.' This addresses oversimplification in Strong's about the name's source and meaning.
Κλεόπας G2810 (Kleópas)
The Strong's gloss asserts a probable contraction from 'κλέος' and 'πατήρ,' presenting the etymology as likely. The revised gloss corrects this by stating the etymology is uncertain and only possibly related, indicating the original's etymological claim is not secure.
κληρονόμος G2818 (klēronómos)
The SIBI gloss corrects the original Strong's etymology. Strong's claims κληρονόμος comes from κλῆρος and the base of νόμος, while SIBI clarifies it derives from κλῆρος and νέμω, noting the connection to νόμος is not direct and is etymologically mistaken in the original gloss.
κλῆρος G2819 (klēros)
The REVISED gloss expresses scholarly caution about the direct connection to the verb κλάω ('to break'), noting that some debate exists, whereas the ORIGINAL presents this etymology as probable. This corrects the impression of certainty in the ORIGINAL's etymological claim.